11 December 2012

Awake & Astounded: II. Dispelling the Shadows - An Advent Series


Isaiah 45:1-8 & Luke 1: 67-79

Sunday of Advent/ 9th December 2012

Light and darkness.  Darkness and light.  Advent and Christmas, placed by the early church at a time when daylight is short and nights are long, at least for those north of the equator. In the midst of dark winter, it’s a season of lights – candlelight and firelight, lights in trees and in windows.  Light mixed with darkness, darkness mixed with light means that it’s also a season of shadows; not one or the other, but each shaping the other.

            The birth of Jesus has traditionally been understood as the giving of light.  Although he was probably born in March or April, the early church situated his birth in the darkest time of the year – yes, to compete with the Roman pagan solstice festival, but also to symbolize the truth that his birth brings life to the dark places.  As Zechariah foresaw, “By the tender mercy of our God, the dawn from on high will break upon us, to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace” (Luke 1: 79).  In the Gospel of John Jesus refers to himself as the “light of the world” (John 8:12).  This image of Jesus was beautifully captured by Ambrose (c.330-397), the bishop of Milan, writing in the fourth century, in the hymn text (which we studied this morning in adult education), “O splendor of God’s glory bright, from light eternal bringing light, Thou Light of light, light’s living Spring, True Day, all days illumining.”[1]  Ambrose was lifting up the early theological claim that Jesus is an extension of God’s glory.  That the light of God is shining through him, that in his light we see light; in Jesus we catch a glimpse of God’s light. God’s light is like a spring of light, the source of all light.  All light emanates from him; all light participates in him.  The light of every day is illuminated by Christ

            There’s a problem, though, with all this emphasis upon light in the Christian experience.  There’s something about it that doesn’t quite ring true.  This might sound odd coming from a preacher in a pulpit.  It doesn’t ring true because we don’t at present live in a world of light.  I’m not saying it’s all darkness, but it certainly isn’t all light.  It’s a little bit of both, sometimes at the same time:  neither light nor dark, but both-and. 

            And yet, in the Christian tradition we tend to privilege light over darkness; we view light as good, positive, happy, darkness is bad, negative, sad and therefore avoided.  Hence we prefer the light; we run from the dark, we fear the dark and darkness.  There are all kinds of problems with this prevailing understanding.  For a start, this attitude has done little to heal the church’s long, conflicted struggle with racism. 

            We prefer to think about happy things, good things, and privilege “light.”  Who doesn’t? 

            But here’s the rub:  when we avoid the difficult, the demanding, the challenging things about the world and ourselves they only grow in intensity and continue to shape us.  There is at work within the Christian tradition a dangerous dualism of light vs. dark, as if we are engaged in a cosmic battle, with darkness as the enemy. 

            There are plenty of scripture passages that seem to support this view. 1 John 1:5 says, “God is light and in him there is no darkness at all.” Or, think of Revelation 21:23, where the New Jerusalem is bathed in the light of Christ and there will be no night.  It’s there in scripture. 

            But by privileging the light, celebrating the light, embracing only the light, avoiding the darkness, hiding from the darkness, fighting and even hating the darkness actually has a way of turning us into the very thing we avoid.  Emphasizing the light makes it more difficult for us to see the size and shape and even weight of the dark things in the world and in our hearts.  We can’t live in the dark, of course, we need light to live.  But the greater the light, the darker is the shadow cast by its light.[2]  If we focus only on the light, then the intensity of the dark grows deeper within us and within the world. Darkness and shadows are still there, still shaping us when we privilege the light.

            But, even more significantly, if we focus only on the light, rejecting the dark places, we just might miss something of God at work there, something of God that is gestating there in the darkness – not unlike Jesus as light spent nine months growing in the darkness of Mary’s womb, not unlike how all of us came to be in the dark.

            There are other passages of scripture in which God celebrates both day and night, for God is the creator of both (Genesis 1:4-5).  God hides in the darkness.  Listen to this text from Exodus:  “Then the people stood at a distance, while Moses drew near to the thick darkness where God was” (Ex. 20:21).  And in Isaiah 45 we have this remarkable text and these shocking words, “I am the LORD, and there is no other; besides me there is no God.  I arm you, though you do not know me, so that they may know, from the rising of the sun and from the west, that there is no one besides me; I am the LORD, and there is no other.  I form light and create darkness, ….”  The darkness is a manifestation of God’s creative design.  And, God has a way of showing up and “shining” especially in those dark places and people – like Cyrus! 

            Isaiah 45 is remarkable because it identifies the Persian King Cyrus as Yahweh’s anointed.  Why? Because when the Persian army arrived from the east and defeated the Babylonians, it meant that the Israelites would be released from captivity and allowed to return home from exile.  What’s remarkable about this text is that the Hebrew word for “anointed” here means “savior,”  “deliverer,” “messiah,” which translated into Greek reads Christos, Christ.  Christ means “anointed one.”  Cyrus is God’s anointed, his messiah, his “Christ,” chosen to be an instrument of God’s grace.  In other words, God has a way of showing up in unlikely places and unlikely people – such as the pagan, Gentile King Cyrus – and working through them in order to bring about salvation, healing.  “I will give you the treasures of darkness and riches hidden in secret places, so that you may know that it is I, the LORD, the God of Israel, who call you by your name. …I call you by your name, I surname you, though you do not know me” (Is. 45:3).

            The contemporary poet Mary Oliver, a person of faith, had a dream and in her sleep she dreamed this poem:     
            Someone I loved once gave me
            a box full of darkness.     

            It took me years to understand
            that this, too, was a gift.[3]

            Darkness as gift.  This too is the message of Advent.  Sitting with darkness, embracing the darkness, waiting for the dawn.  It’s probably why we resist this season, preferring to go straight for the light, for the celebration of Christmas.  But, as we know, we can’t rush the dawn; it comes in its own time. Have you ever waited anxiously and impatiently for the sun to come up?  Perhaps you were having a bad night and couldn’t sleep or you were sick in the night and waited for the dawn. Perhaps you were sitting up all night with your child who was sick, waiting for the sun to rise, waiting for the time when you could call your pediatrician’s office.  Perhaps you went hiking at dusk and lost your way, forcing you to spend the night outdoors in unfamiliar territory and total darkness.  Perhaps your power went out during one of our recent storms and you craved daylight to find out how much damage had been done in your neighborhood by the wind and rain and falling trees. 

            Sometimes in anticipating sunrise we miss what could be called the “darkness beneath the dawn.” That’s how Jim Donnelly describes it.  A member at Woods Memorial Presbyterian Church (Severna Park, MD), Jim recently shared with me a poem he wrote trying to capture a moment.  It’s the moment, he writes,
            Just beneath the bright rays of the morning sun,
            as they breach the glow that is the dawn which
            heralds our new day, lies a band of soulful darkness,
            obscured from our view by the brilliance
            of those first golden spears of light
            that crest the ridge. 
He’s talking about that moment, just before dawn, as the sun’s brilliance rises in the east, there is a band of “soulful darkness” just below the light.  Our eyes might be so focused on the coming light that we miss the darkness just under it, and so we miss its beauty, we miss the moment of grace “in that darkness beneath the dawn.”

            There’s something of that “soulful darkness” missing in our age that prefers the light. The twelfth century Roman Catholic mystic (and later heretic), Meister Eckhart (c.1260-c.1327) wrote, “the ground of the soul is dark.”[4]  It’s not fully known.  It’s mysterious.  Centuries before Eckhart the early church father Gregory of Nyssa (c.335-c.395) – who was not a heretic – said, “it is only after one has quenched the brilliant light of the reasoning mind that one may enter most immediately into the presence and knowledge of God: ‘Moses’ vision of God began with light, afterwards God spoke to him in a cloud. But when Moses rose higher and became more perfect, he saw God in the darkness.”[5]

            I witnessed something of this holy darkness when I was in Switzerland last winter, visiting the International School of Analytical Psychology, one of the two centers in Zurich dedicated to the work of Carl Jung (1875-1961).[6] About an hour outside of Zurich, in the old town of Einsiedeln, there’s an enormous Benedictine abbey, founded in 948, with a chapel and shrine to the Black Madonna.  It contains a carving of Jesus’ mother, Mary, in black.  

The Black Madonna of Einsiedeln
Black Madonnas emerged in the twelfth century in France, Sicily, Spain, Poland, The Czech Republic, and Russia, later in Turkey and Africa.  I was there on a Sunday afternoon for the 4 p.m. Vespers Mass in which priests and choir processed through the church singing – with the crowds following behind them – leading to the shrine of the Black Madonna and then they sang to her.  I was more of an observer on the fringe of it all, watching, than participant, but I was struck by this form of faith and devotion.    One theologian suggests that the “Black Madonna calls us to the darkness and to the depth.  Darkness is something we need to get used to again – the ‘Enlightenment’ has deceived us into being afraid of the dark and distant from it….Thus, to avoid the darkness is to live superficially, cut off from one’s ground, one’s depth.  The Black Madonna invites us into the dark and therefore into our depths.  This is where Divinity lies.  It is where true self lies.  It is where illusions are broken and the truth lives.”[7]

Perhaps, for just a while longer, we can sit with the dark, embrace the darkness, see what it has to teach us.  Perhaps, for just a while longer we can wait before light dispels the shadows, linger there.  For the light of Christ appears in the darkness.  The light shines in the darkness.  It’s in the darkness the light appears.  While the darkness cannot overcome it, the darkness remains (John1: 5). Sometimes the presence of the light intensifies the darkness; sometimes the darkness allows us to really welcome the light.

            The Christian poet T. S. Eliot (1888-1965) knew this truth when he wrote in Four Quartets:
            O dark dark dark…
            I said to my soul, be still,
            and let the dark come upon you…
            I said to my soul, be still and wait without hope
            For hope would be hope for the wrong thing;
            wait without love,
            For love would be love of the wrong thing;…
            Wait without thought,
            for you are not ready for thought:
            So darkness shall be light, and the stillness the dancing.[8]

            In time “the dawn from on high” will break upon us – in the night, as the shepherds knew, in the night – as it always does. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) tells the story of a three-year-old boy whom he heard calling out from a dark room in the night. "Auntie," he cried, "talk to me! I'm frightened because it is so dark." His aunt answered him from another room: "What good would that do? You can't see me." "That doesn't matter," replied the child. "When you talk, it gets light."[ix]

            Jesus is God’s Word to us in the dark.  When God speaks to us, even though it’s dark – maybe especially when it’s dark – it gets light. Thanks be to God.






[1] Ambrose of Milan, “O Splendor of God’s Glory Bright,” c.374.
[2] I am indebted here to the work of C. G. Jung (1875-1961) who has written extensively on the tension of light and darkness within the Christian experience. “One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.” Alchemical Studies, CW, Vol. 13, 265.
[3] Mary Oliver, “The Uses of Sorrow,” Thirst (Boston:  Beacon Press, 2006), 52.
[4] Cited in Fox, 233.
[5] Jean Daniélou and Herbert Musurillo, From Glory to Glory:  Texts from Gregory of Nyssa’s Mystical Writings (Crestwood, 1979), cited in Kathleen Martin, ed, The Book of Symbols:  Reflected on Archetypal Images, The Archive for Research in Archeytpal Symbolism (Taschen), 102.
[6] Specifically, the International School of Analytical Psychology Zurich.
[7] Matthew Fox, The Hidden Spirituality of Men:  Ten Metaphors to Awaken the Sacred Masculine (Novato, CA:  New World Library, 2010), 233.
[8] T. S. Eliot, “East Coker,” Four Quartets.
[ix] Cited in David Benner, Soulful Spirituality:  Becoming Fully Alive and Deeply Human (Brazos Press, 2011), 142

04 December 2012

Awake & Astounded: I. Stay Open - An Advent Series


Psalm 24 & Revelation 3: 14-22

First Sunday of Advent/ 2nd December 2012

            Lift up your heads, ye mighty gates,
            Behold, the King of glory waits;
            The King of kings is drawing near;
            The Savior of the world is here! [1]

These words, this hymn (which we sang at the beginning of the service) summon us to enter a new (liturgical) year, a new world, a new dimension, a new and holy space.  “Lift up your heads, ye mighty gates.”  That’s what the psalmist sang:  “Lift up your heads, O gates! And be lifted up, O ancient doors! That the King of glory may come in” (Psalm 24: 7).  It’s an entrance psalm, a psalm sung for a royal procession, the procession of the Ark of the Covenant up into the great temple of Yahweh in Jerusalem.  It was sung by a choir, with call and response, as the Ark, the dwelling place of Yahweh, made it’s way to the temple mount.  And as they approached the gates of the temple and its ancient doors, the choir sang to the doors, commanding the gates, to rise, to open.  Do not block.  Do not hinder.  Make way. Open up and allow the glory of God move through your threshold and permit access, so that that the walls of the temple might indeed become a sanctuary, a container, a dwelling place for the sanctus, the Holy, the Holiness of Yahweh.

             And the procession made its way to the temple because the temple is the meeting place between heaven and earth, the axis of the world, the axis mundi, the point of connection, the point of contact, the meeting place between the people and God.  The psalmist tells us, “Such is the company of those who seek him, who seek the face of the God of Jacob” (Psalm 24:1).
 
            We, too, are in that procession, aren’t we?  We, too, are among the company of those who seek after God, who seek the face of the God of Jacob.  That’s our story, isn’t it?  Their procession is our procession, that long walk through a lifetime that’s continually searching and seeking after the face of God, the presence, the place of meeting.   The search for the face that won’t turn away is one of the deepest desires of the human heart and we are never, ever fully satisfied until we find it.  It’s what everyone desires. Whether one believes in God or not, I believe this deep hunger for the face drives the human spirit.[2]  Advent is a time when we remember – or maybe discover for the first time – the depth of that desire, when we remember the meaning and joy of the procession and return to it (or perhaps finally join it).

            Fling wide the portals of your heart;
            Make it a temple, set apart
            From earthly use for heaven’s employ,
            Adorned with prayer, and love, and joy.

            The author of this hymn text, Georg Weissel (1590-1635), a seventeenth-century Prussian pastor-theologian, takes the literal reference to a temple structure and beautifully transforms it into a metaphor for the human heart and then invites us to an internal or inner Advent.  The heart then becomes like a temple, the dwelling place, the meeting place of God.  And in order for that to happen the gates of the soul need to be lifted up, the ancients doors of the heart flung wide open to allow access. The King of glory is coming and wants to come in.  Yahweh is on the move and wants to come in, wants to live among us, to get close. Make way.

            But as we all know, this is easier said than done.  Those gates are heavy and the doors are thick.

            The Franciscan priest and writer, Richard Rohr, was recently asked the question, What do you think God is doing these days?  What is God up to?  Rohr’s answer was this:  “God is into giving away God.  That’s all God is doing is giving away God.  There’s nothing else.  That’s God’s job description.  I want to give away some more God.  And God is trying through every metaphor, every act of creation, every moment of time to reveal a little more of God.”[3] So why don’t we feel it?  Why don’t we see it?   Why don’t we experience it?  Because we put up so many obstacles and barriers and gates and heavy doors that we shut God out, we deflect God’s goodness, block God’s love, reject God’s presence, we close our eyes, and fence off our minds, and wall off our hearts.  But, why?  Why do we do this?

            Gates, doors are provocative symbols. They offer protection.  They keep us safe in our homes, protect our families.  They’re also mysterious and dangerous.  Gates stand between here and there, between the known and unknown.  They are places of transition. The ancients had great respect for thresholds, these liminal places, they could be holy, sacred places, we still have all kinds of rituals associated with them – shoes are removed before them, brides are carried over them, Jews place mezuzahs over them and Christians place crosses and a modern pagan might nail up a horseshoe or two.[4] Gates and doors can take us from what is known into the unknown, from one world into another.  And that’s why they’re potentially dangerous. 

            Can you risk opening the door?  Can you risk stepping through the threshold?  That’s what Advent is about.  The psalmist says, “Lift up the gates.”  But there’s something in all us that wants to keep them shut, tight. Maybe we’re self-satisfied with things as they are.  Maybe we’re feeling self-sufficient, that we’re happy and content and comfortable. Maybe we think we don’t need anything or anyone – even God.

            We must always be on guard when these thoughts and feelings of self-sufficiency surface – and they will – because often they’re hazardous illusions. That’s what the Spirit said to the church in Laodicea.  They were shut off in their bubble of self-sufficiency and complacency and could not see the state they were in.  As a result, they suffered from a bland indifference and paralyzing indecision.  “I know your works,” Jesus said, “you are neither cold nor hot.  I wish that you were either cold or hot.  So, because you are lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I am about to spit you out of my mouth.”  The exact rendering here is actually stronger, something like vomit.  “For you say, ‘I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing” (Rev. 3:15-17a).

            Laodicea was an exceptionally rich city in central Asia Minor (Turkey).  “It was so wealthy that after it was utterly destroyed by an earthquake in 60 C. E., the city proudly refused imperial disaster assistance from [Rome] and rebuilt the city completely with its own resources.”[5]  It was at a crossroads in Asia Minor, a city well known and well endowed by its textile, banking, and medical industries.  Its signature commercial items were shiny black wool and Phrygian powder, which was mixed with water to make a medicinal eye salve.  They also had a significant water problem.  The source of their water came from the medicinal springs of Hierapolis, six miles away.  By the time it made it’s way down to Laodicea, its “tepid and mineral content made the water nauseating.”[6]  The people were prone to spit it from their mouths.

            The wealth of the city made its way into the church so that the church, too, was wealthy and self-sufficient. They were not open to the truth of their condition.  “You do not realize,” Jesus said, “that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked.”  Jesus reproves them in love and says, Open up and see.  I offer you real wealth, refined by the fire of suffering.  Instead of black, itchy wool, I offer you white robes of cloth. And here, put my salve on your eyes, this will heal your blindness.  Jesus is quite harsh with First Church, Laodicea.  They think they’re doing the work of Christ, they think they’re being good witnesses, they think Christ is among and within them, but he’s not. 

            How do we know this?  Because he says to them, “Listen! I am standing at the door [– on the outside of the door, which they have closed against him –] knocking.  If you hear my voice and open the door, I will come in to you and eat with you, and you with me” (Rev. 3: 20).

            Can you risk opening the door?  Will you allow him to cross the threshold and come in?  Doorways can be risky places, but also holy places, sacred places.  When we lift up the gates and open the doors of our hearts – and keep them open – open long enough to welcome the movement of God’s glory across the thresholds of our lives, then something holy and miraculous will occur – I promise.  This is Advent – it’s about opening up and staying open long enough to welcome the presence, the birth of God, the face of God in our midst.

            Redeemer, come!  I open wide
            My heart to Thee; here Lord, [in my heart, Lord] abide. 
            Let me Thy inner presence feel;
            Thy grace and love in me reveal.





[1]From the hymn, “Lift Up Your Heads, Ye Mighty Gates,” written by Georg Weissel, was first published in 1642.  It was translated from the German by Catherine Winkworth (1827-1878) and published in The Chorale Book for England (1863).
[2] On the “search for the face,” I am indebted to the work of James E. Loder, The Transforming Moment (Colorado Springs, CO:  Helmers & Howard, 1989).  See also, Kenneth E. Kovacs, The Relational Theology of James E.Loder:  Encounter and Conviction (New York:  Peter Lang, 2011).
[3] Richard Rohr’s comments may be found here: www. http://vimeo.com/49803870.
[4]The Book of Symbols:  Reflections on Archetypal Images, The Archive for Research in Archetypal Symbolism (Taschen, 2010), 558.
[5] Brian K. Blount, Revelation (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2009), 80.
[6] Blount, 80ff.

19 November 2012

Called to Freedom


Galatians 2:1-10
 Twenty-fifth Sunday after Pentecost/ 18th November 2012

“The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present.  The occasion is piled high with difficulty – and we must rise to the occasion.  As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.”  That’s what he said.  That’s what Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) said.  December 1, 1862 in an address to Congress, one month before signing the Emancipation Proclamation.  Remarkable words, remarkable insight, a model of visionary leadership. 

            With the release this weekend of Steven Spielberg’s new movie Lincoln, we are given a new look into the life of our sixteenth president.  I saw the movie yesterday and it was great.  I’ve always been struck by Lincoln’s strength, courage, and deep moral core.  As a religion and history major at Rutgers College, I wrote a thesis on Lincoln’s theology and his quest – a spiritual quest – to save the Union.[1] On Election Day this year I felt drawn to go back to the Lincoln Memorial, my favorite place in Washington, DC, to read again those profound lines in the Second Inaugural, “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds.”

            From our vantage point, Lincoln was among our great presidents, perhaps the greatest. During his presidency, however, especially through the storm of the Civil War, he had his critics, even in his own Republican party. What made him a great leader, however, was his determination to be his own person. He knew the right, the moral, the just thing to do.  He was not called to be popular.  Yes, he was politically savvy and wise, but he was also his own man.  And he was odd.  He was odd looking. He marched to the beat of a different drum.  While Lincoln was never a formal member of any church, as president he often worshipped at the New York Avenue Presbyterian Church, just a few blocks from the White House.  He was good friends with the pastor, the Reverend Phineas Densmore Gurley (1816-1868). Instead of sitting in a pew where his presence might be a distraction during worship, Lincoln listened to the sermon from the pastor’s study with the door cracked open. 

There was a kind of freedom in Lincoln’s own being that freed him to be his own person (and the movie makes this clear); he was free to be odd and different, free to do the unpopular thing, especially freeing the slaves and bringing an end to slavery – which was unpopular even in the North.  A liberation, as Lincoln said in his address at the National Cemetery in Gettysburg, just 52 miles from this sanctuary, yielding “a new birth of freedom.”

            I can imagine that Lincoln would have gotten along well with the apostle Paul.  There might be a little of Paul in Lincoln – for Lincoln knew his Bible, he read Paul’s letters.  Lincoln had large parts of the Bible memorized; it was part of his being. (As a boy he regularly recited the Sunday sermon by memory later in the week for his friends.)   They were both lawyers, although Paul’s early life does not parallel Lincoln’s early life, when Paul was known as Saul, before the Damascus Road experience, before Paul had a change of heart. Paul, too, was not popular; he was looked at with suspicion by both the Jewish authorities and the early followers of Jesus.  Paul was driven – not by pride, ego, or ambition, but as he himself said, he was driven by the Spirit of God.  At the beginning of the letter he makes it plain, “Paul an apostle – sent neither by human commission nor from human authorities, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father” (Galatians 1: 1), and later he added, “I want you to know…that the gospel that was proclaimed by me is not of human origins; for I did not receive it from a human source, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ” (1:11-12).

            That “revelation” was a turning point in Paul’s life.  It was “a new birth of freedom” for him. Despite his former life when he was actively persecuting the followers of Jesus, he was now a Jesus follower.  Not just a follower, but also an apostle, that is, someone sent by God to serve the revelation of God found in Jesus Christ.  Because of the grace that Paul experienced – Saul, now Paul – Paul knew that everything in his life had changed.  This past week I heard Bono (of U2 fame) speak at Georgetown University.  He talked about the need for “a conversion heart.”  When a conversion of heart occurs, you cannot un-know what you’ve come to know, you cannot un-see what you’ve come to see.  This was true for Paul.  There was no going back

            Paul was given a new understanding of God – a God rich in mercy and grace to the likes of him, a God not easily “managed,” who takes delight in doing the unexpected.  God did that which was unthinkable, unimaginable for a Jew.  God was at work in someone like Jesus, who, according to the Law must be considered “cursed.”  As Deuteronomy states, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree” (Deuteronomy 21:23).  The cross is like such a tree.  The fact that God would raise, would justify such a man and then to embrace the fact that such a man was God’s son – all of this was blasphemous for Saul.  But for Paul, it was also true. As Paul discovered, God isn’t too worried about blasphemy. God is doing something new.  And so Paul was given, then, a new self-understanding, how he viewed himself had to change.  And how Paul understood his role in the wider Roman world was also in need of change.[2]  In relation to these – God, self, world – Paul was given a new birth of freedom through a revelation that changed his life.  This was so earth shattering and mind-blowing for him that he went away to Arabia (Jordan) for more than fourteen years.  It’s not surprising that Galatians is known as the epistle of freedom.  Paul writes in Galatians 5, “For freedom, Christ has set us free, do not submit again to a yoke of slavery” (5:1).

            What is that yoke of slavery?  The burden, the enslavement of empty religiosity.  For Paul, that meant all the trappings of the Jewish Law.  Some said that one has to become Jewish before following Jesus.  Being Jewish entails following the dietary laws, kosher laws, for some, circumcision, the sign of covenant.  Paul, raised in the tradition, says, no.  A Gentile does not have to follow Jewish practices in order to follow Jesus.  This is the tension, the conflict, the war waging in the church in Galatia and throughout the Jewish world. 

Why does Paul feel this way? Why is he so passionate about this? Because he knows from personal experience that God’s love and grace always liberate, they always free us. It’s the grace and love of God that matter most, therefore we need to be wary and even “war” against anything that asserts that we have to do something or be someone in order for God to love and accept us.  Religious rituals and practices are not wrong, but in themselves, they’re not the means of grace.  As you can imagine, therefore, the authorities in Jerusalem were not happy with Paul.  Paul was undermining the tradition and the institution that preserves these traditions.  And so Paul stayed away from Jerusalem for at least ten years.  As a new follower of Jesus, Paul left everything.  He went to Arabia (Jordan) – to make sense of his new calling, to live with other Jesus followers.  He’s on his own, for the most part, probably part of a Christian faith community.  Like Lincoln, he’s odd, aloof, doing his own thing, following the rhythm of a different drum.  Paul runs from conflict, hiding from the conflict tearing the church apart:  the Jewish-Gentile question.

            Paul easily could have stayed away from Jerusalem.  He could have demonized the Jewish authorities. He could have dug in his heels and refused to have anything to do with them, living isolated, cut off, alienated. That would have been a natural response, a human response.  We can think of plenty of parallels in our age, both within and without the church, of similar conflicts tearing apart community, with name-calling, demonizing, us vs. them attitudes.  He could have dissociated himself from Jerusalem – and maybe, at some level he wanted to do that. 

But that’s not the way of Jesus Christ.  That’s not the way of the God and Father of Jesus Christ.  That’s not the way of a Christ-follower.    “Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabus…. I went up in response to a revelation” (Gal. 2:1). Another revelation, an insight, a tug of the Spirit, a word from the Lord that would not allow him to remain cut off, but sent him into the lion’s den, as it were; a word from the God that sent him to “them,” to the other, to the people who were excluding him and making it difficult for him to live.

Can you imagine what that conversation was like?  Can you image what that was like, having to justify his very existence before a group of people who believed he was wrong? But he went and told his story – he gave testimony, he witnessed to God’s grace in his life.  And when they heard his story and saw the evidence of grace in his life, “when James and Cephas [Peter] and John, who were acknowledged pillars, recognized the grace that had been given to me, they gave to Barnabus and me the right hand of fellowship…” (Gal. 2:9).

The right hand of fellowship.  Reunion.  Connection.  Communion.  Peace. Reconciliation. That’s the way of Jesus Christ.  That’s the way of the God and Father of Jesus Christ.  That’s the way of a Christ-follower.  That’s what Paul had come to know.  That’s what the Spirit called him toward.  That’s what Christ is always calling his sisters and brothers toward.  Reconciliation.  Paul knew from his own personal experience that God’s good news is ultimately about reconciliation, healing alienation, restoring relationship. Paul knew in his bones, in his body, in his guts that there was a time when he was alienated from God’s way, but now he is welcomed home nevertheless.  He knew that by grace that Christ was alive in him and therefore he was ultimately free – free to live in a new relationship with God, with himself, and with the world.  He was then free to go the people he was alienated from to experience reunion, the relationship restored.  This is what grace can do. This is what grace always does.  It’s not what we expect; the outcome is more than one could ever hope for, always yielding something new.  Paul says elsewhere, “So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation:  everything old has passed away; see, everything has become new!  All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting the message of reconciliation to us” (2 Corinthians 4: 18-19).

“The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present….we must think anew and act anew.”  The old ways, the expected ways, the usual ways are inadequate to the present, new ways are required, new ways are given by grace in order to allow us to do a new thing in the world.

When Lincoln stepped out of the Capitol building to give his Second Inaugural Address in 1865, the crowd, indeed, the world were expecting a speech that would humiliate and shame the Confederacy.  The city was packed with visitors.  There were not enough hotel rooms available.  People were sleeping in hotel hallways on cots.  One reason why space was so limited was because every other available space was used for wounded and recovering soldiers.  There were hospitals everywhere.  The number of amputees in the city shocked visitors.  The people were angry and mad. Every family was touched by grief and loss. Approximately 700,000 people died the war – an enormous percentage of the population in the 1860s. Compared to our current population today, it would be equivalent to approximately 5 million casualties.[3]

Lincoln never says Confederacy, traitor, nor rebel in the speech.  He doesn't feed off of their hate and anger and need for judgment and retribution.  Instead, in a speech lasting just eight minutes, he ends with these words:  “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds.”  Remarkable, really.  Where does such wisdom and grace come from? The crowd and the press didn't know what to “do” with such a speech.  It’s not what they expected.  But it’s what was needed for reconciliation.  Grace is never what we expect. It always surprises us. In just over a month Lincoln would be dead, on Good Friday. Yet, he had the freedom to say and do what was needed to be said and done. 

That’s why I think Lincoln and Paul would get along.  It’s why I hear a lot of Paul in Lincoln. The freedom exercised by Paul and Lincoln and countless others is always available to you and me.  For God’s grace and love always yield liberation.  Liberation for us – a new birth of freedom – and liberation for others.  Anything less is no gospel.  Anything less, Paul would say, is “anathema” (Gal. 1:8-9).  Anything less than liberation is not gospel.


Image: The only image of Abraham Lincoln giving the Second Inaugural Address on March 4, 1865.  Photograph by Alexander Gardner.
[1] Kenneth E. Kovacs, “Lincoln’s Quest for Union: The Use of Covenantal Thought as a New Paradigm for an Historical and Political Understanding of the Relationship Between Religion and Culture in America, 1801-1865,” Rutgers College, B.A./ Henry Rutgers Scholar Thesis, May, 1986.
[2] Here, I am indebted to Brigitte Kahl’s extraordinary commentary, Galatians Re-Imagined:  Reading With the Eyes of the Vanquished (Minneapolis, MN:  Fortress Press, 2010), 277. “God’s apocalyptic revelation (apokalypsai, 1:16) drops him into a devastating threefold self-alienation that entirely distorts his image of himself, of God, and of the other…” (277).
[3] See Ronald C. White, Jr., Lincoln’s Greatest Speech:  The Second Inaugural (New York:  Simon & Schuster, 2002), 21-29.