A Sermon for the Fourth Sunday in Advent
Matthew 1:18-25
Matthew 1:18-25
Joseph
is caught. Stuck. He’s been thrown into an excruciating
dilemma, a conflict of cosmic proportions.
Mary, his fiancé, is pregnant.
Joseph knows he’s not the father.
They were never intimate. They
lived apart. Matthew tells us that Mary
“was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 1:18). In Matthew’s telling of Jesus’ birth we’re
missing Gabriel’s announcement to Mary (Luke 1:1-26) and Mary’s song of praise,
the Magnificat (Luke 1:46-56), as we find in Luke. If we just stay in Matthew’s account, and try
to forget Luke’s version, we soon discover that we don’t know how much Mary
knew about this baby growing within her.
Did she know it was the result
of the Holy Spirit? That’s what Matthew
tells us, but did she know? And, if she did, is that what she told
Joseph, the part about the Holy Spirit?
Did she tell him? And, if she
did, did he believe her? Did Joseph
believe that God was somehow involved in this scandal?
And that’s what it was—scandalous. It was shameful, humiliating,
disgraceful and immoral in the eyes of Jewish Law, for both Joseph and Mary. Matthew tells us that Mary was engaged or
betrothed to Joseph, so not technically married. But they were essentially married, for what
we need to know is that betrothal or engagement was a formal contract of union
by which both parties were bound. Rabbinical law declared that the betrothal
was equivalent to an actual marriage and only to be dissolved by a formal
divorce.
Marriages were
arranged. The betrothal of a young girl,
under the age of twelve, was the prerogative of the father and the girl had no
say in the matter whatsoever. Around the age of twelve the betrothed moved from
under the authority of her father to her future husband. This means that Mary was close to twelve
years told when she became pregnant. Betrothal
was as binding as marriage itself.
So, we can appreciate Joseph’s dilemma (and Mary’s, of
course). According to the law, Mary
would be viewed as an adulteress. An engagement
could be nullified one of two ways, through a public legal proceeding with
formal charges filed against her, and if proved, she and the father of her
child would be condemned to death by stoning (Deut. 22:13-30). The other way was private, by issuing a
document of repudiation. Either way
Mary’s life would have been over, her reputation ruined. There was one other option, Joseph could stay
engaged and raise the child as his own, but that would mean a very different
life for them both.
It’s tricky. A lot is
riding on Joseph’s decision. There’s
nothing sentimental about this story, this story—this season—can so easily be
smothered by sentimentality. Theologian Stanley Hauerwas reminds us, “One of
the great enemies of the gospel is sentimentality.”[1] This story is not sentimental. It’s scandalous.
What should he do? Matthew tells us that Joseph was a “righteous
man.” Because he was a “righteous man
and unwilling to expose her to public disgrace, he planned to dismiss her
quietly” (1:19). “Righteous” here
doesn’t mean that Joseph was a nice guy or good man or a gentleman. The word “righteous” does give us a clue about
the kind of man Joseph was and something about his enormous dilemma. “Righteous” here means that he is “scrupulous
about keeping the commandments of God, the Old Testament law, striving to live
his life in harmony with the will of God, to follow to the letter all of the
provisions of the Mosaic law.”[2] He’s a traditionalist; we might say he was a
religiously conservative man. And he’s
facing a profound ethical crisis.
What should he do? He
can’t stay in the relationship. The
prospect of bearing her shame and raising this child that wasn’t his really
wasn’t option for Joseph. He knows what
the law commands. He knows what the
letter of the Jewish law tells him he ought to do. He knows his tradition. He knows what he learned in Sabbath
school. He’s obviously compassionate, so
he chooses the second option, dismissing her quietly, instead of the public
trial and possible death sentence.[3]
But the law is the law and he is righteous.
You can sense Joseph’s struggle here.
So he develops a plan. And just
at the moment he resolved to dismiss her, perhaps the night before he planned
to carry out his decision, he has a dream.
His ego, that is, his waking thoughts and will came up with a plan that
was rational, practical, religiously proper, but his deeper self, the depths of
his soul, revealed that something else needed to happen, something that from
the perspective of a traditionalist like Joseph must have felt scandalous and
shocking and unsettling and scary.
The Holy Spirit spoke to Joseph in a
dream. Sometimes that’s the only place
where God can get our attention, in a dream.
When the ego, our waking consciousness, gives up its control and we
sleep, the unconscious, the depths of our psyche, the depth of the soul upon
which our lives are built, comes alive and begins to speak through words and
images and feelings and experiences. Not
all of our dreams our holy, of course—but sometimes they are. Sometimes the Holy speaks us to clearly and decisively
through a dream. In this dream Joseph
confronts a power greater than his ego.
And this is a remarkable dream. It
beautifully illustrates how dreams work.
Dreams often compensate for our waking life. They often mirror back to us what is missing
in our waking life. Dreams are
corrective. And they are often prospective, in that they move us
forward in a certain direction. They try
to lead us somewhere. They tell us where
we should go.
And, so, what does the Holy Spirit
dream through Joseph?
“Joseph, son of David….” The Holy Spirit addresses by name and roots
Joseph in his past, reminding him of his identity as a descendant of David,
David, the shepherd boy, the surprising choice to be Israel’s first king (1
Samuel 9-16).
“Do not be afraid…” The dream, the
Spirit speaks to Joseph’s struggle. He’s
obviously afraid. “Do not fear.” That’s
what God often says to our frightful egos.
“Fear not.”
“Do not be afraid to take Mary as
your wife….” In other words, stay engaged.
Don’t dismiss her. The Spirit is
effectively saying, forget being righteous, forget what the tradition says;
stop worrying about following the rules.
Why?
“For the child conceived in her is
from the Holy Spirit.” Now he knows who
the father is. This is the first
indication to Joseph that it’s all God’s will.
And then Joseph learns. “She will bear a son, and you are to name him
Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.”
The Spirit is declarative here.
She will bear a
son…
And you—not Mary,
not someone else—you, Joseph, are to name him Jesus.
And he will save his people from their sins.”
Then we’re told, “When Joseph awoke
from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him” and defying the law,
“he took her as his wife, …and he named him Jesus.” Jesus.
Yeshua. Joshua, meaning “Yahweh
saves.” Yahweh saves by being with us. Emmanuel. God with us. Joseph aligns his life with Mary’s life and
with the life of the child and with the will of God.
When he awoke he knew exactly what
he had to do, no matter the cost. It was
a risky resolution to this excruciating dilemma. I use the word excruciating intentionally, because it was like a crucifixion for
Joseph, suspended there between oppositional options.[4] Dismiss her publicly or privately? Let her go or keep her? But how could he keep her and still be
righteous?
Sometimes we have to be thrown into situations of enormous inner
conflict, suspended between opposites, wrestling, struggling, waiting for a
resolution, waiting, like Advent itself, for a third way to emerge, an
unimagined way, a scandalous, surprising, and holy irruption that changes everything! This is how we develop into mature people of
faith. This is very often God’s way in
our lives, it’s how we spiritually grow; and it’s how God moves and shapes the
flow of history toward its redemptive and liberating purpose.
That dream changed Joseph’s life. It changed him. What came to the world in the birth of Jesus—what
has made its way right down to you and me today on account of his birth—was
borne by that dream and what Joseph discovered in it.
Can you imagine waking from such a
dream? Joseph learned “that being truly
righteous does not mean looking up a rule in a book and then doing the ‘right
thing’; it means wrestling with the complexities of a problem, listening to the
voice of God and then doing God’s thing.”[5] Being righteous is not about be pure and
perfect, trying to be good little boys and girls all time, but joining with God
to be about God’s redemptive work in the world.
Indeed, Joseph discovered something
that is true for all of us. He came to
know in the dream what is always true: our
lives are not our own. Your life is
not your own. It doesn’t belong to
you. We have been entrusted with our
lives so that our lives can bear the hope of the world. We need to see our individual lives, small as
they are, as embedded in God’s mission of redemption and reconciliation. Our individual lives are situated in another
drama; we are essential characters in God’s ongoing nativity play. We are part of the unfolding story of God’s
redemption and healing of the universe.
Joseph’s dream shows us,
beautifully, that this larger life, the life of God is being lived through
us. It’s not only a reality out “out
there” in the world, but also in us, within us, in the depths of our
psyches. God’s dream is being dreamed
through us. And therefore the dream
shows us that we’re not alone. God’s
purpose is working itself out through us.
So don’t be afraid. Stop being
afraid. Someone is on our side. And it’s essential that we know this and
remind ourselves of this again and again.
Why?
Because, as Joseph came to know,
when he realized that Mary’s child was holy, he carried a great
responsibility. He was responsible for
the raising of the child, no matter the risks involved. The dream made a particular claim on his
life, a demand. It was a command. When he awoke he knew that he had a job to
do. He had no choice. “And he named him”—Joseph named him—“Jesus.”
Joseph assumed the mantle of responsibility.[6]
The German theologian Rudolf
Bultmann (1884-1976), a “theologian of Advent,” once said that the believer is
constantly being “wakened to life through the claim of the future.”[7]
Just as Joseph was wakened to life
through the claim that was being made on his life, the same is true for every
believe; we waken to life through the claim, the claim of God’s future being
made on our lives, through what is being asked of us. We can’t just hear this story of Jesus’ birth
as something that took place a long time ago, which changed the world, which we
remember and celebrate in Advent and at Christmastime. The story makes a claim on its hearers. We can’t be passive listeners to the story,
disinterested. If you’re baptized that
means you’re already inside the
story. The story tells us God is the one who summons us and claims us and commands
us and sends us. The story asks for a commitment,
it requires a decision. It demands something of us. We’re responsible for the living of this
story, for carrying the story. To follow
Jesus means that we, too, are to be about God’s work of saving people from
brokenness and sin. We, too, are part of
the drama of God’s redemptive story to save and heal humanity and save and heal
the world. You can’t hear this story without
also hearing the unique demand it’s making upon your life.
What is God dreaming through you? What holy command are you hearing in the
darkness of the night? Where is God in
the process of waking you up? Did you notice that the organ prelude this morning was J. S. Bach's (1685-1750) "Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme" (BWV 140), "Sleepers awake, a voice astounds us!" Where are you awakening to life through the claim
God is making on your life right now?
These are challenging, some would say scary times that we’re
living in at the moment—but they’re no more challenging for us than it was for
Mary and Joseph. “For a time such as
this” (Esther 4:14), what are you being called to? What difficult, challenging, even scandalous
thing is the Spirit leading you toward as a follower of Jesus Christ? What is the Spirit calling you to say or do
for the sake of liberation and redemption, for the sake of God’s love and God’s
justice and God’s healing?
I believe that God makes a claim on every one who bears God’s
image. And, like Joseph and Mary, there
comes a time for us to set aside our personal agendas and plans for our lives,
and consent to the voice and will of God, to yield and bow and ultimately kneel
before mystery of the Incarnation and the summons of God. And then there comes
a time for us to get up, fully awake, and go wherever the Spirit leads—to
Bethlehem, to Galilee, to Jerusalem, and beyond. Where is the Spirit calling you?
Image: Alexander Ivanov (1806-1858), Joseph’s Dream (1855)
[1] Stanley Hauerwas, Matthew (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2006), 33ff.
[1] Stanley Hauerwas, Matthew (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2006), 33ff.
[2]
Thomas G. Long, Matthew (Louisville:
Westminster John Knox Press, 1997), 12.
[3]
Geza Vermes, The Nativity: History and Legend (Doubleday, 2006), 57.
[4]
C. G. Jung talks about the “crucifixion of the ego, its agonizing suspension
between irreconcilable opposites” being essential for the growth of the
individual (individuation) and greater differentiation of consciousness. See “Christ, A Symbol of the Self” in Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of
the Self, Collected Works 9, ii, par. 123-124 (Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 1978).
[5]
Long, 14.
[6]
See Fritz Kunkel, Creation Continues: A
Psychological Interpretation of the Gospel of Matthew (New York: Paulist
Press, 1987), 37.
[7]
Rudolf Bultmann, What is Theology?
cited in David W. Congdon, Rudolf
Bultmann: A Companion to His Theology (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2015), 38. “Theologian
of Advent” is Congdon’s designation (146).
No comments:
Post a Comment