21 September 2014

Having Something to Say

Psalm 130 & 1 Corinthians 2:1-16

21st September 2014

In his letter to the Christians in Corinth Paul wrote, the “message about the cross” is “the power of God” (1 Cor. 1:18).  In other words, the cross is forever “preaching,” that is, proclaiming something. The cross has a message, a story for us, for the world. Paul, summoned by the Holy Spirit to serve that message, saw himself as a proclaimer, a preacher, a prophet. “My speech and my proclamation,” Paul explained, “were not with plausible words of wisdom, but with a demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might rest not on human wisdom but on the power of God” (1 Cor. 2: 4-5). “And we speak of this things,” Paul said, these divine things, “in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual things to those who are spiritual” (1 Cor. 2:13). And so Paul was called to speak a word. As is true for all preachers, his words carried and contained another word, a different word. Not the Bible, but the Word, the Word heard within the words of scripture, the Message of God that can’t be confined by any text.  And so Paul became a preacher.

You might wonder, as I did as boy, how a preacher comes up with something to say week after week after week.  How does a preacher come up with all those words? It was an important question for me to answer. 

Twenty-four years ago, on 23rd September, I was ordained by Newark Presbytery at the First Presbyterian Church of North Arlington, New Jersey.  On that Sunday evening in 1990 I answered the ordination questions, several feet from the font where I was baptized in 1964, and then knelt for the laying on of hands.  How I got to that moment, how I continue to live from that moment, has something to do with the question, how does a preacher come up with all those words? How does one become a preacher?

When people ask me—Why did you become a minister? —I get a little anxious. Not because I’m reluctant to share my story, but because, like most things in life and most things pertaining to the Holy Spirit, it’s complicated. The last time I shared my story here at CPC was back in October 1999, right after I arrived from New Jersey. So here’s my call story. It’s not a reflection on how my theology has changed in the past twenty-four years or what I’ve discovered about the Church or myself or of God, and not what I sense God calling me toward these days. These I’ll leave for another time.  Here’s how I felt called to preach. 

I was born and raised in the Presbyterian Church.  My father, Edward, although a Protestant (his father’s family were part the Reformed Church in Hungary), rarely went to church.  My mother, Grace, on the other hand, taught Sunday school for more than forty years at First Church, North Arlington.  When she died in 1992 we calculated that she taught thousands over the years.  She was my teacher, twice. I had perfect attendance and still have the awards to prove it. My maternal grandmother was an active member of that church, as were her parents.  They arrived in Kearny and North Arlington from Dundee, Scotland, in the early 1900s. Kearny was a point of entry for thousands of Scots to the United States. Many were Presbyterian.

I loved going to church as a boy. I had a lot of friends.  I loved my teachers. I have wonderful memories. I can remember the smell of paste and glue in the Sunday school rooms, the taste of juice and cookies we enjoyed after class each week, the smell of grape juice and bread on the mornings we celebrated the Lord’s Supper, it filled the whole sanctuary.  Have you ever noticed that wonderful smell in our sanctuary on morning when Communion is served?  Every June we had our Children’s Day service and I was often asked to read scripture or offer a prayer or a given a message. There were several older women in the church, many with Scots accents, who used to say to me after these services, “Kenny, you’re going to be a minister someday! You’re going to be a minister!”  I smiled politely but said to myself, “Never. I’m going to be a history teacher.”

One Communion Sunday I remember being in worship and watching the minister—the Rev. Dr. Henry C. Kreutzer, the minister who baptized me—standing behind the Communion Table wearing his black Geneva robe and white preaching tabs and saying, “People will come from south and north, east and west to sit at table in the Kingdom of God” (Luke 13:29).  I was so awed by what he said!  What’s so special about a loaf and a cup that people would travel far and wide to receive it? What was taking place there? Where is this Kingdom of God?

It was around age eleven or twelve that I started playing with the idea—or, more correctly, the idea started playing with me—that maybe I would become a minister.  But there was one major problem:  I could never figure out how a minister came up with so much to say Sunday after Sunday.  I didn’t like to write and I couldn’t imagine myself preparing a sermon every week. The thought was agony. What should I do?

We had marvelous youth leaders at my church.  They were field education students from Princeton Theological Seminary and they left quite an impression on me. Our seminarians often brought us down to the seminary and I fell in love with the place. (Actually, I wanted to go to Princeton Seminary before I felt called to the ministry. I know. I was an odd child.)  One Saturday in Princeton I visited the University Store, which used to be on University Place, and remember buying a brown, spiral-bound notebook, which read “Princeton” on the cover.[1] It was 1979.  If I’m going to be a minister, I thought, I better figure out how to write a sermon.  This notebook would contain my first sermons.  So, after school I went home, looked through my Bible, chose a passage of scripture, took out my notebook, and began to write a sermon.  Now, of course, I didn’t know how to write a sermon!  So I set out to write a sermon a day!  (This was just lunacy.)  After several tries I gave up.  It was impossible, I thought.  Too difficult.  I had nothing to say.  So I gave up the idea of being a minister.

Several years later, when I arrived at Rutgers College, something started to stir within me again. Freshmen year was a challenge.  I registered for several history classes and an Introduction to Old Testament class—I went to Sunday School, knew my Bible, that would be my “gut class,” my easy A.  Well, that class just about killed me.  It devastated me.  It shattered my world.  It shook me to the core.  I went into a deep crisis of faith. I almost became an atheist. I didn’t realize that I was a literalist when it came to reading the Bible.  I learned in class that scholars—back in the early nineteenth century—argued that Moses did not write the Pentateuch (the first five books of the Bible).  Moses could not have written these books because Deuteronomy contains an account of his death!  (See Deuteronomy 34:1-8.)  Not one, but four authors were involved in its formation, written over centuries.[2]  I thought, “If I can’t take this part of the Bible at its word, what about the rest of the Bible?  Can it be trusted?  Maybe I’m just fooling myself about this faith stuff.”  I got an A in the class and so in the spring I took Introduction to New Testament.  That class challenged me too, but then I got another A.  I started to like my religion classes. 

Then I took what I thought was a very radical class, “Religion and Politics,” taught by Dr. Hiroshi Obayashi.  I didn’t think religion had anything to do with politics.  I was obviously very naïve.  We read a lot of Karl Marx (1818-1883).  Obayashi changed my life when one day he asked, “How about taking the theology class next semester?” It was the highest-level course offered by the religion department.  I was a sophomore.  I was flattered, registered for the class, but, to be honest, I didn’t even know what theology was!  That class changed my life.  I became enthralled by the way ideas can change and transform our lives and I discovered the sheer joy that comes with serious, honest, thoughtful discussions about God.  I had to read a book written by the Swiss Reformed minister Karl Barth (1886-1968), The Word of God and the Word of Man (1928).  That book made my brain hurt—but it taught me how to think theologically. 

It was around that time that I started to read the sermons of the German theologian Paul Tillich (1886-1965). Tillich served in the trenches of the First World War and later become one of the great theologians of the twentieth century.  His sermons were so existential and honest and real, intellectual, they wrestled with difficult questions of life and death and meaning, ultimate things, all of which spoke to me at a very deep level—depths I didn’t even know were there. 

And then, one evening, as I was reading one of Tillich’s sermons, “The Shaking of the Foundations,” based on a text from Jeremiah that speaks to the role of the prophet/preacher—I’ll never forget that moment—I felt something give way in me.  By the time I finished reading the sermon I wanted to preach.

Why? Because I felt deep within me, for the first time, that I had something to say, that there was something that needed to be said, to be shared, and, greater still, there was something that I had to say.  I was compelled.  I didn’t have a choice.  There was this burden, this weight of responsibility within me. I had a desire to talk about God and about what God has done and is doing through Christ.  This was not a desire to say something about me, what I’ve done or experienced.  It had something to do with me, of course, it was my experience, but it had more to do with God.  What I sensed emerging within me was a voice—a voice that was mine and yet not mine. It was then that I realized I had something to say.  And I was beginning to sense how a minister came up with all those words week after week. 

It was around this time that the minister at my home church—the Rev. Daniel J. Weitner—invited me to preach on Reformation Sunday. This both frightened and excited me at the same time.  I worked on that first “real” sermon for weeks. I poured my heart into it and gave it the title “To Understand.”[3]  

I eventually graduated from Rutgers with a double major in history and religion—from Rutgers, an extremely liberal, secular school.  I’m grateful for the faith-challenges I experienced in such a context.  I left Rutgers with my mind and my heart on fire, with a definite call to preach.  Then the journey continued—after one semester at Yale Divinity School I transferred to Princeton Seminary, as a seminarian I served several churches in Connecticut and New Jersey, received a fellowship at graduation from Princeton that took me to Scotland, ordained to serve St. Leonard’s Parish Church in St. Andrews, as an assistant minister, studied at the University of St. Andrews, came back to the United States in 1991, I served seven years at the First Presbyterian “Hilltop” Church in Mendham, NJ, called to Catonsville in 1999, and eventually finished my PhD in 2002.  The journey continues.

Since that time back at Rutgers my voice has become stronger, more confident to say what I alone can’t say, yet must say.  This is why preaching might be called, to borrow from Barth, “the impossible possibility.” The voice is mine and yet it’s not mine. The message comes through me and picks up some of my “me-ness,” but it’s not mine.  It doesn’t belong to me, yet it comes through me.  We have this ministry “in clay jars,” as Paul said, “so that it may be made clear that this extraordinary power belongs to God and does not come from us” (2 Cor. 4:7).  As Tillich said of the prophet, “No true prophet has ever prophesied voluntarily,” that is, preached voluntarily.  “It has been forced upon him by a Divine Voice to which he has not been able to close his ears.”[4]  There are times when I feel called to preach a sermon that I don’t necessarily want to preach, but must. Every pastor struggles with this tension. Every pastor knows what’s going to ruffle the feathers of a congregation, she knows someone is going to get ticked off about something; he knows there will be resistance and pushback. That’s what the gospel does.  Preachers are not called to say what the church wants to hear, but what we sense, by grace, the church needs to hear.  As the old saying goes, the role of the preacher is “to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.”

Over the years I’ve learned two things. 

First, when we’re dealing with God, never say never. 

And, second, I now know how a minister comes up with all those words.

Truth is:  It’s a bottomless well. And the Spirit, who searches the depths of God, searches us and shows us what needs to be said.  For, “the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God” (1 Cor. 1:11).  To be honest, there is so much that needs to be said.  There is no way to exhaust the message of the Divine Voice. There isn’t enough time to say all that needs to be said.  This is true for all of us.  The Spirit shows all of us what needs to be said.

You, too, have a voice.  You have something to say.  This morning during adult education we heard from our youth that participated in the Youth Service Opportunities Project in New York City in June.  They closed their presentation with a group photo standing in front of a large poster with these words printed on it, words from the Quaker George Fox (1624-1691).  It read:  LET YOUR LIVES SPEAK!

Knowing that we have something to say is critically important because there are things only you can say, good news that only you can share, good news the world is literally dying to hear.  There are people out there waiting to hear a word from the Lord—and you have no right to withhold it from them.  There are people waiting to hear what only you can tell them about God’s love and grace.  They need to hear it and they need to see it, in you and me, from within your experience of God’s love. 

For “God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself,” (2 Cor. 5:19) as Paul said. Surely of the most sublime verses of scripture and one of my favorite texts.

God comes in Christ with love, forgiveness and grace.
God comes in Christ to transform our lives with a New Creation.
God comes in Christ to reconcile and to heal our lives,
                        our families,
                        our relationships,
                        our communities.
God comes in Christ to liberate us and set us free.
That, my friends, is the good news. 
That, my friends—that’ll preach.





[1] Princeton TheologicalSeminary and Princeton University are separate institutions, although historically related. Princeton University, originally called The College of New Jersey, was charted in 1746 by Presbyterians to educate ministers, but later expanded its mission beyond training clergy.   Princeton Seminary was founded in 1812 by the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church to educate and train ministers to serve the expanding western frontier of the new nation. Today, there is a strong bond between the two institutions. The Seminary commencement services are held at the University Chapel.
[2] The four "authors" or traditions are known as J (Yahwist), E (Elohist), P (Priestly), and D (Deuteronomist).
[3] The sermon was heavily influenced by my reading of Barth’s The Word of God and the Word of Man (Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1978).
[4] From Paul Tillich’s sermon “The Shaking of the Foundations” in The Shaking of the Foundations (New York: Charles Scribner’s and Sons, 1948), 8.

14 September 2014

Loving the Stranger

Andrei Rublev (1360-1460), the "Hospitality of Abraham,"
 also known as the "Trinity" icon.
Genesis 18:1-15 & Romans 12:2, 9-15

24th Sunday in Ordinary Time/ 14 September 2008

It’s tough to tell how many showed up that day.  The text isn’t clear whether Yahweh was alone or had three men, possibly angels, with him, for it says both. Perhaps Abraham’s sight was blurred in the heat of the sun and it looked as if three men had appeared. The first eight verses of Genesis18 move along at a clip. Abraham offers water to wash their feet and allows them to rest. He offers a little bread to provide rest for their onward journey, never presuming that he is the reason for their visit. He does everything to make his guests feel welcomed, unhurried, relaxed. These are all understated expressions of hospitality, but then Abraham throws the kitchen ovens on full heat. Behind the scenes he’s sending everyone off to mix the flour (6.5 pounds worth), to knead the bread and tells Sarah to put a cake in the oven. Abraham runs off to the herd to get a calf—tender and good—and gives it to the servants to prepare it. Then they fetch something to drink. All this flurry of activity is going on in the background so that Abraham can provide an enormous feast for his guests and make it look easy. A feast for Yahweh and friends.


We’re drawn into this text by Abraham’s generosity and welcome. In Abraham’s world hospitality was the primary act of a civilized people. Abraham and Sarah’s actions are in sharp contrast to the people of Sodom and Gomorrah, as told in the next chapter in Genesis, who were not hospitable to their divine guests. This turned out to be the real sin of these cities: inhospitality.[1] Not so with Abraham and Sarah.

After eating, the guests wish to speak with Sarah, who was in the tent. Women probably did not eat with men and were kept separate. (I’ve seen this arrangement many times in both Kenya and the Democratic Republic of Congo.)  One man says to Abraham that when he returns next year Sarah will be pregnant with a son. Sarah, overhearing the conversation from the tent, begins to laugh to herself about the whole affair. I’m sure she got a really good laugh out of that. But Yahweh wasn’t laughing. Yahweh says to Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, and say ‘Shall I indeed bear a child, now that I am old?’ Is anything too hard for Yahweh? At the set time I will return to you in due season and Sarah shall have a son.” Then Sarah comes out of the tent and denies it, “I didn’t laugh.” By this time she was afraid. Then Yahweh said, “Oh yes, you did.”

This is an extremely old story, definitive for the Hebrew people and all those blessed through the faithfulness of Abraham and Sarah, both Christians and Muslims. Old Testament scholar Walter Brueggemann makes the strong case that everything in this narrative revolves around this pivotal question: “Is anything too hard for Yahweh?” It might even be the fundamental question of the Bible. And it’s God’s question directed right at us: Is there anything too hard for Yahweh? 

What do you think?  Be careful how you answer.  Say, Yes, then God is not God; say, No, then be prepared for amazement.

A lot rides on our capacity to be receptive.  It always does. So much depends upon our ability to remain open. Doesn’t it? A lot depends upon our willingness to welcome, well—God, and all that that entails. In fact, there is a direct link between being hospitable to a stranger and entertaining the presence of God. There is a connection between welcoming God and welcoming a stranger. There’s a link between receiving guests and receiving God and, therefore, receiving a blessing.

Here’s why. This text provides a remarkable window into the custom of hospitality in desert cultures. But it’s about more than social etiquette. It says something about the way we make space for the other, for the stranger, whoever the stranger, the other might be.  Our ability to be hospitable is a measure of how open we are to the presence of God, to those moments when God shows up.  In other words, when God shows up, unannounced and unexpected, in surprising circumstances and people, how will you respond? Will you welcome what God has to say? Will you be ready?  Are you welcoming? 

One way the Hebrews and early Christians prepared themselves to welcome the presence of God was to make sure they were hospitable to everyone. Because God just might show up on your doorstep in the stranger—or the strange. And what is stranger than God, the Ultimate Stranger?  The ever-elusive One who is Wholly Other, whose ways are not our ways, the One known and yet always unknown and mysterious. What are you going to do when God shows us?

In a recent book, Christianity for the Rest of Us: How the Neighborhood Church Is Transforming the Faith, Diana Butler Bass notes that one of the ten signposts of churches experiencing renewal is its approach toward hospitality. What is hospitality? It’s more than simply having “welcoming committees” or hospitality programs, “where friendliness seems little more than a phony act to get newcomers to join the church.” We’re not talking about a kind of religious Welcome Wagon, that emerged in the 1960s, which, “for all its friendliness, was essentially a way to promote certain stores and products.” And hospitality is not a code word for “promotion,” with the church as the primary product, hospitality isn’t “an instrument used for another end: to sign people up as pledging members.”[2] That’s not hospitality.

True Christian hospitality” Bass says, “is not a recruitment strategy designed to manipulate strangers into church membership. Rather, it is a central practice of the Christian faith—something Christians are called to do for the sake of that thing itself.”[3]  Hospitality is not instrumental; it’s not a means to an end, it’s not something you do to get something else.  It’s an end in itself.

Christian hospitality has its origins in desert, nomadic cultures where each guest was honored, given respect, cared for, fed, sheltered, so that one could continue on their journey. Hospitality was essential in a culture full of nomads, sojourners and seekers, traders in traveling caravans trying to make a living, and religious pilgrims.  We might not be caravan traders today, but all of us nomads and spiritual sojourners and pilgrims searching for home.  Every traveler who crosses the threshold of our space, every pilgrim who crosses the threshold of our lives needs to be honored, given respect, cared for, sheltered, offered food for the onward journey.

And hospitality was practiced by the first Christians because they discovered in Christ something of the welcome of God.  Knowing a similar welcome, personally, in your lives, in your hearts, will make you more welcoming—it just will, naturally. Knowing the welcome of God will free you to be hospitable to the other, to the stranger. In her spiritual classic, Dakota, Presbyterian writer Kathleen Norris wrote, “The classic sign of God’s mystery is to entertain, to make room for the other.”[4]

In fact, the first Christians loved the other, loved the stranger so much that Roman society was puzzled by it and in awe.  Many in Roman society considered Christians misanthropes, that is, inhuman, because they dared to love strangers and care for people beyond the limits of their family.[5]  In Hebrews 13:2 we read, “Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by so doing some have shown hospitality to angels unawares.”  And you can see it here in here Romans 12:13. “Extend hospitality to strangers.”  Philoxenos.  Paul is talking about Philoxenos, loving the stranger. (The Greek reads, Φιλοξενίαν.)  What Paul is talking about is the polar opposite of xenophobia, the fear of the stranger. Philoxenos—love the stranger, love the foreigner. That’s what Christians do. That’s what we do. For we all know what it’s like to be foreigners, that is, living beyond the borders of God’s Kingdom, when God’s love and grace were alien to us and we were aliens to God. 

Christians make space for the stranger because God in Christ has made a space for us.
Christians welcome the stranger because we know ourselves welcomed by God.
Christians welcome the stranger because we suspect the face of the other just might be the face of God.

You never know who’s going to show up at your tent flap!

When the Roman Empire finally collapsed amid social chaos and violence it was Saint Benedict (c. 480-c.547), in Italy, who first formed monasteries, in the sixth century. He established places of refuge, communities commissioned to “receive guests as Christ.” To this day Benedictines have to welcome every guest who arrives at the door of their monasteries or abbeys.

Hospitality is not a program or a technique. It’s a way of life that stands at the center of who we are. It shapes how we bear the name of Christ. Hospitality flows from our hearts. This is something we as a church have spent a lot of time talking about over the last couple of years. The renovations back in 2008 were done within the theological context of hospitality and they’re continuing with the reconstruction of the Beechwood steps.

Constructing a building hospitable is one thing.  Forming a hospitable community of people is something else.  This requires constant effort; it’s an ongoing journey for all of us, as our Vision study demonstrated several years ago. There’s always room for growth in this area because there are always new people coming into the church.  We must continually ask: how can we deepen our expression of hospitality? It’s a question for all of us. For, we as a church might think we are being hospitable, but is that how people think and feel when they meet us and get to know us? Do they see Christ in us, in our words, in our actions? Do we see Christ in them? Do we see Christ in one another?

Consider all the people who come through this building and the Church House. Many come as guests for worship. Are those visiting today seeing Christ in us? And there are others who cross our thresholds who are not part of this or any faith community. Do they see Christ in us? Do we welcome them as we would the Lord or are they imposing on “our” space? Consider all the groups that meet here: Al-Anon, martial arts groups, Scottish Country dancers on Monday nights in the gym, the Scouts; presbytery committees; Concert Series guests; the people who come to the counseling center in the Church House. Think about all the children in our Child Care Center and their parents dropping off and picking up their children every day. Or think of the contractors who are on site every day. Sure, we’re paying them to do a job, but who are they? What do they see in us? Do they see Christ in us? Do we see Christ in them? Back in 2008, one contractor came up to me and asked me to pray for close friends who lost a parent, a child, with a second child seriously ill. What an unbearable burden to carry. I said I would pray and that we would pray. And we did.

Love the stranger. Be hospitable. Extend welcome.  Feels risky, doesn’t it? Of course it is. The Christian life is always risky. It means we have to be vulnerable.  And this is scary.  I know.  But what if we started small?  When you find a seat at the picnic after worship today…you can sit down with people you know or you can choose to take a risk and sit by someone you’ve never met before or someone you don’t know well or a stranger who bears the image of Christ, a stranger who might become your new best friend or soul mate. What’s the worst that can happen?

It’s always easier to stay with the known, but the Holy Spirit is always pushing us elsewhere, inviting us to open our hearts, reach out, and welcome the other.  This is how community is formed; this is what the church is really supposed to be about and what it’s supposed to look like, a community full of difference and diversity forged together by the Spirit into a people by the grace of God, united in Christ. Because we’re united in Christ there is space for difference and diversity.  When we’re united in Christ, rooted and grounded in God’s love, only then can we be hospitable and graceful toward people with different viewpoints, different political and cultural values, different races and ethnicities and backgrounds, people you might consider “strange,” people who make you uncomfortable or trigger anxieties and fears or bring out the worst in you.  The psychologist Carl Jung (1875-1961) once said, “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”[6]  And, I would add, it’s precisely with this kind of self-understanding, gained in this way, that the life and health of the Church can be renewed. When we know that we have been and that we are welcomed into the church by the arms of Christ we are free to get close to people we keep at arms length.  Without this, how is true community going to take place?

The wise and generous soul, Henri Nouwen (1932-1996) once said, “When hostility is converted into hospitality then fearful strangers can become guests…. Then…the distinction between host and guest proves to be artificial and evaporates in the recognition of unity.”[7]  In a post-9-11 world, now thirteen years out from that fateful day,  a world filled with greater hate-filled extremism, an ever widening clash between civilizations, insidious political polarization at home and abroad, and vilification of others with differing outlooks, opinions, and experiences, the practice of authentic, risky, Christian hospitality is needed all the more. Wouldn’t you agree?  

God is still calling the Church, expecting the Church—you and me—to model a different way of being in the world, a “still more excellent way,” rooted in love.  The work we’ve been given to do as the Church, invited to share in through the welcome of Christ, is essential today. And I’m grateful, that we get to be a part of this work, to be engaged in God’s work in the world—together.




[1]See James Brownson, Bible, Gender, Sexuality: Reframing the Church’s Debate on Same-Sex Relationships (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2013), an outstanding presentation of contemporary academic scholarship written for non-academics. Matthew Vines, God and the Gay Christian: The Biblical Case in Support of Same-Sex Relationships (Convergent Books, 2014) provides a good overview of recent scholarship and how it informs life experience, 60ff.
[2] Diana Butler Bass, Christianity for the Rest of Us: How the Neighborhood Church Is Transforming the Faith (HarperOne, 2007), 77-87.
[3] Bass, 77-87.
[4] Kathleen Norris, Dakota: A Spiritual Geography (Mariner Books, 2001), 198.
[5] Abraham J. Malherbe, Social Aspects of Early Christianity (Wipf & Stock, 2003) and Moral Exhortation: A Greco-Roman Sourcebook (Westminster John Knox Press, 1989).
[6] C. G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections (New York: Vintage Books, 1965), 247.
[7] Henri Nouwen, Reaching Out: The Three Movements of the Spiritual Life (Doubleday, 1975), cited in Bass, 86.

07 September 2014

A Wonderful Story


Matthew 18:15-22

Twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time/ 7th September 2014

Several years ago I came across the work of contemporary poet Stephen Dunn. There’s one poem that particularly spoke to me.  It’s called “At the Smithville Methodist Church.” Dunn recounts his daughter’s experience at Vacation Bible School one summer. Dunn and his wife are essentially agnostics.  They’re skeptical about religion in general, not hostile to it, but they’re not sure what to make of VBS and their daughter’s emerging faith. Here’s how he captures the experience:

It was supposed to be Arts & Crafts for a week,
but when she came home
with the "Jesus Saves" button, we knew what art
was up, what ancient craft.

She liked her little friends. She liked the songs
they sang when they weren't
twisting and folding paper into dolls.
What could be so bad?

Jesus had been a good man, and putting faith
in good men was what
we had to do to stay this side of cynicism,
that other sadness.

OK, we said, One week. But when she came home
singing "Jesus loves me, the Bible tells me so,"
it was time to talk. Could we say Jesus

doesn't love you? Could I tell her the Bible
is a great book certain people use
to make you feel bad? We sent her back
without a word.

It had been so long since we believed, so long
since we needed Jesus
as our nemesis and friend, that we thought he was
sufficiently dead,

that our children would think of him like Lincoln
or Thomas Jefferson.
Soon it became clear to us: you can't teach disbelief
to a child,

only wonderful stories, and we hadn't a story nearly as good.
On parents' night there were the Arts & Crafts
all spread out

like appetizers. Then we took our seats
in the church and the children sang a song about the Ark,
and Hallelujah

and one in which they had to jump up and down
for Jesus.
I can't remember ever feeling so uncertain
about what's comic, what's serious.

Evolution is magical but devoid of heroes.
You can't say to your child "Evolution loves you."
The story stinks
of extinction and nothing

exciting happens for centuries. I didn't have
a wonderful story for my child
and she was beaming. All the way home in the car
she sang the songs,

occasionally standing up for Jesus.
There was nothing to do but drive, ride it out, sing along
in silence.
[1]


“I didn’t have a wonderful story for my child,” Dunn said.  So what exactly is this “wonderful story” of ours?  How do you sum up it up?  I’m not sure the Church tells one story.  The story is Jesus and Jesus is the story of God’s love. But how do we tell such a story, this multi-faceted-gemstone-kind-of-story of ours?  There are many aspects to it and we approach it from many perspectives and angles.

It seems to me that everything we do in a church is grounded in the belief that we have a story for our children. Our worship, our fellowship, our community around this Table are all because we have a wonderful story for our children. Our ministries of sympathy, service, and witness, our educational and missional aims are all because of this story. Even all the dust and debris around here at the moment with the demolition and reconstruction of the Beechwood steps are all because this is the place where we tell our wondrous story and we need a way to get in here to hear it.

There are plenty of great stories to shape the lives of our children, marvelous stories that enliven the lives of our children.  But what makes this story—our story—so different is the way it speaks to the why question.  Evolution, for example, speaks to the how question.  That is, how we got here. But evolution doesn’t love you and me. The Bible’s story, including the opening chapters of Genesis, is less about how we came to be than why and for what.  I do not doubt the veracity of evolution.  However, Genesis is not a scientific text.  It tells a different kind of story and answers a different set of questions. Our job in the Church is to speak to the question why.  Parents can tell their children (in good time) how they came to be.  But the deeper, more profound question why?—why do they exist? why do we exist?—the answer to these questions requires a different kind of narrator. 

The Bible’s story puts our children—and us—into the world, into this deeply disturbing and scary, yet wildly wondrous, glorious and beautiful world.  The Bible places our children and us into this amazing world with meaning, purpose, love, and grace. This story tells our children why they exist. It gives them and us a song to sing and sanctifies our lives and makes us holy.  Our children can’t discover this story on their own and neither can we. The story tells us that we are loved more than we could ever possibly imagine, that we’re not alone in this universe, that Jesus is present within us and among us.

And for Matthew here one significant part of the gospel story is forgiveness. Forgiveness, because it is related to God’s love and grace, stands at the center of the gospel narrative, the Church’s story.  However neither Jesus nor Matthew had any romantic illusions about the nature of the Church and it’s ability to practice forgiveness.  We might sing, “Blest be the tie that binds our hearts in Christian love,” yet painful breaks can and do occur in our relationships.  We might sing, “We are one in the Spirit,” yet cruel words and thoughtless actions can and do separate and divide us.  We might sing, “The church’s one foundation is Jesus Christ her Lord,” but there’s plenty to weaken the strongest of churches.[2]

Matthew tells us how to live together. Work it out. Seek reconciliation. Try to make amends. Reach out. Why? Because wherever two or three are gathered in Jesus’ name he’s there too. When we’re quick to accuse and judge, shun and exclude someone from the Church, we need to remember that Christ is among us and in the person we dislike or want to shun, in the one who makes us uncomfortable.  When we focus on Jesus at the center of the community we remember it’s not about us: the church doesn’t exist for us, we exist for the church.  God doesn’t exist for us; we exist for God. The focus on Christ draws us out of our isolation and allows us to live together.

But Peter, always the practical one, says, “Okay, Lord, fine. Sounds great in theory. Just tell me the minimum number of times I have to forgive so I know when I don’t have to forgive any more and can then throw that person out of the church.” Peter wants to put a limit on the generosity of grace. In fact, Peter doesn’t understand grace.  Actually, a person who knows something about grace would never ask such a question.  If we think and act like Peter here, then it means that we don’t know what grace looks like and feels like either. Seventy-seven times.  Don’t count.  Don’t keep track. Grace doesn’t keep count. Grace doesn’t keep count.  Just keep on doing it. Why? Because without forgiveness there’s no community, there’s no Church.

Now it’s possible to just tell or teach the story of forgiveness without being shaped by it. We can teach our children how they ought to forgive, but ignore it ourselves. However, the nature of this story is such that we can’t just teach or simply tell it (and when we do, we’ve missed the point). It’s a story we have to experience.  And we experience it even as we tell it because we discover is that we’re already we’re in it.  By virtue of our baptism we’re already within the grand narrative of God’s grace. And we can tell that the story is having an influence us in the difference it makes in our lives, in the way it’s shaping us—in the way followers of Jesus relate to others, especially when the family of Jesus gathers in community and tries to be faithful together.  That’s the test.  For, to know that God has forgiven us but then withhold forgiveness toward our neighbor is, in the end, to be ungrateful.  It’s forgiveness known only intellectually, not experientially, personally, from within.  To know that God has forgiven us but then withhold forgiveness toward ourselves is also to be ungrateful. An experience of forgiveness yields further forgiveness.

Knowing the undeserved and unearned forgiveness of God becomes the cornerstone of the Christian experience and sits at the center of who we are. It’s embodied in the Table. Several years ago, worshipping in Iona Abbey in Scotland, a long Communion Table was set up right down the center of the medieval nave. There is a tradition of this within the Scottish Church.  The Independent Presbyterian Church in Savannah, built by the Church of Scotland, has a very wide center aisle in order to accommodate a Communion Table, stretching from one end of the sanctuary to the other. I wish we could do the same here at CPC. It’s a powerful way to say that the Table sits at the center of what we do. It’s why Jesus gives this meal to us.  It’s why John Calvin (1509-1564) wanted Communion served every Sunday in Geneva, because this meal helps to remind the Church that Christ is among us and within.

Jesus makes the story of God’s forgiving love tangible and real. And this meal is offered again and again and again in the hope that someday we’ll finally get it—that we and our children will know that we’re forgiven in the eyes of God and then, in the words of Paul Tillich (1886-1965), finally “accept our acceptance” and live from this truth.[3]
  For people long to know they’re forgiven, whether they believe in God or not. People are hungry to know they’re forgiven. This wonderful story of ours tells us that nothing can separate us from God’s love (Romans 8). When we know—really know this—we’re living from within the story.

And so with grateful hearts, accepting God’s forgiveness offered at the Table, we can rejoice. Like Stephen Dunn’s daughter at VBS, we can jump up and down all the way to the Table—go ahead, if the Spirit moves you—singing hallelujahs, beaming all the way home.





[1] Stephen Dunn, New and Selected Poems, 1974-1994 (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1994), 183-184.
[2] Thomas G. Long, Matthew (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997), 209.
[3] From Paul Tillich’s famous sermon “You Are Accepted” in The Shaking of the Foundations (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1955).