Matthew 19:16-22
Twenty-first Sunday after Pentecost
Don’t be quick to judge. Assuming he’s telling the
truth—and nothing in the story suggests otherwise—the man is a pious and
faithful Jew. The story of this man appears in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and is
often called the story of the rich, young ruler. Only Luke describes him as a ruler, and only
Matthew portrays him as young. They all
agree that he had money, he was rich. He had authority, influence, and
privilege, all of which comes with wealth. There’s nothing inherently wrong
with being rich. As far as we know, he came to his wealth honestly. He was a
religious man. There’s no suggestion that his question to Jesus that day was
anything less than sincere. He honestly wants to know what is necessary to
enter eternal life. By “eternal life” he doesn’t mean the afterlife. The young
man genuinely wants to know how to live a good life, a life of blessing and
goodness, a life that is holy, that reflects the goodness of God.
So, we mustn’t be quick to judge him. And, if truth
be told, I think we would discover that he’s not that different than us, the
average Presbyterian who is trying to live a good life, a faithful life, a life
that reflects the goodness of God. And we are rich. Some of us are wealthier than others, that’s
true; but just by virtue of being an American, the majority of the world would
consider even the poorest American, rich. That said, by American standards, Presbyterians
are wealthy. We need to be honest about this. Of course, there are poor
Presbyterians. And most Presbyterians are not extremely wealthy. But Presbyterians compete with Episcopalians
for the crown of the wealthiest Christians in the United States and the world. With wealth comes responsibility. “To whom much is given,” Jesus said, “much
will be required” (Luke 12:48). Presbyterian
institutions are among some of the best supported and most highly endowed in
our country: congregations, colleges, seminaries, the Presbyterian Foundation, which was founded in 1795.
So, yes, Presbyterians have more in common with the rich young ruler
than we might suspect. But we must not let a focus on money and wealth get in
the way from seeing what’s going on here, from seeing what’s at stake for this
faithful man.
“Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal
life?” (Mt. 19:16). Jesus, being a good
teacher, makes him suffer a little, he throws a question back to him and raises
the tension. “Why do you ask me about
what is good? There is only one who is
good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments” (Mt. 19:18). Notice
how Jesus says, “enter into life,” not “eternal life.” Jesus says if you want know how to live, keep
the commandments. God did not give us the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20), the
Decalogue, to make our lives difficult.
As every faithful Jew knows, the Law is a gift, a form of grace, given
by a loving God to show us how to live rich, holy, meaningful lives. The Law is given in love. But the man wants to be sure that he’s
following the correct ones. “Which ones?” he says. He’s anxious to get it right. So Jesus recites a portion of the Law, not
all of it, mind you. “You shall not
murder; You shall not commit adultery. You shall not steal.” Jesus doesn’t even mention the first Law, “You
shall have no other gods before me.” It
doesn’t matter, because as we’ll see, Jesus is not really concerned about the
commandments—he is, but he isn’t.
The young man says, “I have all kept all these;
what do I still lack?”—and, now we get to the heart of things. Jesus goes straight to the core issue. “If you wish to be perfect, go, sell your
possessions, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in
heaven; then come, follow me” (Mt. 19:21).
And what happens next? We’re told
that, “when the young man heard this word, he went away grieving, for he had
many possessions” (Mt. 19:22).
Jesus answered his question, but it wasn’t the
answer he wanted to hear. He went away grieving. You could say he was possessed,
possessed by his possessions, which prevented him from entering the richer,
fuller life Jesus was inviting him to experience as a disciple. As we know all too well, it’s very easy to be
possessed by our possessions. We talk as
if we own things; but often things own us.
Peace Pilgrim, otherwise known as Mildred Norman (1908-1981), the
twentieth century spiritual teacher, who walked more than 25,000 miles back and
forth across the United States advocating for peace, said, “Anything you cannot
relinquish when it has outlived its usefulness possesses you, and in this
materialistic age a great many of us are possessed by our possessions.”
Now, given the way things turned out for the man,
it’s easy to think that this story is a warning against materialism, against
accumulating things, and having wealth.
There is a danger when our obsession with things and wealth and riches
take over our lives. This might have
been the case for the man, we don’t know.
Jesus does go on to say in the next couple of verses, “Truly I tell you,
it will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven…it is easier
for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to
enter the kingdom of God” (Mt. 19:23-24).
Jesus says this, not because being rich or having wealth is inherently
bad or evil. It’s not. The issue, as
Jesus knew, is that so many rich and wealthy people have a heart problem. The problem is not that their hearts are,
like the Grinch, “two sizes too small.”
It’s not a question of size. It’s a deeper problem.
We get a clue to what Jesus is aiming at when he
says, “If you wish to be perfect, go, sell your possessions….” If you
wish to be perfect. It’s easy to
skip right over this phrase, but it’s critical to hearing this text
correctly. And it’s easy to miss because
English is often incapable of capturing the meaning behind Jewish and Greek
words and concepts. The clue should be the use of the word “perfect.” The rich young ruler said nothing about
wanting to be perfect. He didn’t say,
“Rabbi, what good deed must I do to be perfect.” Jesus introduces the word because
that’s what Jesus wants for him, because Jesus knows what’s really behind his
question, because Jesus knows that he is motivated by a deeper desire, a more
profound search and hope for something.
The clue is the use of the word “perfect.” The only
other place in Matthew’s Gospel where we find the word “perfect” is in the
Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5:48, “Be perfect as your heavenly father is
perfect.” This is no mistake. It’s very intentional. The English word “perfect” can trip us up. We
hear “perfect” and think of never making mistakes, being morally pure, sinless,
beyond reproach. We hear moral overtones in the word. Unfortunately, “perfect”
doesn’t accurately render the richness of the Greek word in the text: teleios. Teleios is better rendered as “wholeness,” “undivided,” “complete”
(and only in this sense does it mean perfect, as in lacking nothing). It’s perfection, but perfection in the sense of
being wholehearted, integrated. It’s related to another Greek word, eudaimonia, which means human well-being
or flourishing.[2]
As we discussed last Thursday morning in our Bible
study, in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus doesn’t summon his disciples to moral
perfection but to a wholehearted orientation toward God. Jesus wants us to be whole, complete, just as
God is whole and complete. Jesus invites us live out our end or purpose, just
as God lives out God’s end or purpose. That’s what it means to be “perfect” as
God is “perfect.” Just as God is
undivided in God’s intent to love, so Jesus summons us to live undivided lives.
When Jesus judges the practices of the Pharisees in Matthew he’s not judging
their faith, he’s concerned about the way they’re living out their faith, the
external practices of living out the law, their obsessions with external
obedience and cleanliness. It’s
one-sided. What about the inner life?
What about the heart? That’s why Jesus
calls the Pharisees white-washed tombs.
On the outside they look pure and holy, but on the inside they’re
rotting away (Mt. 23:27).
What about “in here,” in us? What about the heart? Jesus wants us to view human life
holistically. Jesus wants us to live
whole lives, where the life of the inner person, the heart, matches the outward
life, so that the inner and outer life are in harmony. When the inner and outer parts of our lives
are whole, and when the heart is aligned with the heart of God—do you know what
happens then?—the doors of the kingdom open wide before our eyes. That’s teleios. That’s perfection. We experience human flourishing. But woe to us
when our hearts are divided, when our inner lives are not aligned with our
outward actions, when are hearts are not behind our actions, when our hearts
are not aligned with God’s vision for us, when our actions do not flow from the
heart. “Where you treasure is, there will your heart be also” (Mt. 6:21).
That was the rich young ruler’s issue. He had a heart problem. It wasn’t a question of its size. He had a divided heart. His heart was split. He lacked integrity.
~ ~ ~ ~
It’s because Jesus loves him and wants the best for
him—if you want to be perfect, if you want to be whole, if you want to be complete—that
he tells him to sell his possessions. What Jesus does in that moment is reveal
his divided heart to him. Jesus unveils
what the man cannot see on his own. In a moment of grace, Jesus helps him to
see what he cannot see on his own, see what’s preventing him from entering into
life. Jesus shows him that he is not teleios.
Being rich isn’t his problem. He has a divided or disordered heart, that’s
his problem. “His heart is disordered in that he ultimately values
wealth more than entering the kingdom, his treasure on earth more than his
treasure in heaven…The issue is not money per se but wealth as a possible
preventer of the heart-level wholeness required to be a disciple of Jesus.”[3] Jesus is offering a richer, fuller life
through serving the kingdom, following his way, being his disciple or student.
But just imagine
what might have been. What if he came to
value the kingdom, the way of Jesus, more than his wealth? What if he became
possessed by the kingdom? A heart made whole and reordered could have resulted
in his wealth being placed in service to the kingdom of God. He could have put
his heart, along with his wealth, in service to kingdom work. But that prospect was too much for him. His divided heart got in the way. He valued his wealth more than the kingdom.
And he went away grieving.
And we grieve
with him. And we grieve for ourselves, because we know that his struggle is our
struggle too. For him, it was
wealth. For you, it might be wealth or
it might be just about anything. We know
what hinders us from the richer, fuller life of God. Our divided hearts betray us, again and again
and again.
Jesus wants us to be whole, one,
complete. He wants us to live wholeheartedly and to give all of ourselves. So
that this should be our prayer: Give me a whole heart, O God. Give me an undivided heart.
Several weeks ago, Rev. Susan Beck
led our adult education class in the morning.
She’s pastor of the Community of St. Dymas, a Lutheran congregation
within the Maryland State correctional system.
Susan shared that in worship, when it comes time for the offering, that
the inmates, because they don’t have money to place in the offering plate, offer
themselves up to God. They become the
offering. All of themselves. It reminded me of a story told by another
Susan, the Rev. Susan Andrews, former moderator of the General Assembly. Her father was a pastor, and she remembered
that as a little girl her favorite part of worship service each week was the offering. She imagined herself curling up into an
offering plate and offering herself up to God.
Jesus invites us to give all of ourselves, not only
part of ourselves, to the work of the kingdom. When we live wholeheartedly, we
flourish. And you and I were created to
flourish. And when we are flourishing,
God is glorified. Then our lives—every part of us— become a thank-offering.
Image: Heinrich Hoffmann (1824-1911), Christ and the Rich Young Ruler (1889).
[1]
Jonathan T. Pennington, The Sermon on the Mount and Human Flourishing: A Theological Commentary
(Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2017), 74ff.
[2] Pennington, 80-82.
No comments:
Post a Comment